CFP: Urban Polycrisis and Creative Storytelling, ISA World Congress 2027, Korea


XXI ISA World Congress of Sociology in Gwangju, Korea (4th-10th July 2027)

https://www.isa-sociology.org/isa-events/xxi-world-congress-of-sociology

Urban Polycrisis and Creative Storytelling: A Feminist/and Decolonial Approach to Urban Pedagogies

Organisers: Dr Nian Paul (Independent Researcher and Research Lead, Decolab), nianpaul2012@gmail.com

Dr Raina Ghosh (Urban Studies Foundation International Fellow, University of Amsterdam), rainaghosh@hotmail.com


Session Type: Oral Presentation (This CFP is for an in-person session at ISA only)

Research Committee: RC 21 Sociology of Urban and Regional Development

Language: English (open to all language media) 

Time: 105 mins

The urban polycrisis is at the heart of global discussions on adaptation, resilience, and transformative action. The crises of genocide, climate change, resource extractivism, shrinking economies, political upheaval, housing crisis and unequal pathways to development are increasingly manifesting across the globe and especially in cities of the Global South that carry the enduring impact of colonial exploitation. Against this backdrop, feminist/and decolonial methodologies are challenging the ways we understand, evaluate, politicise and respond to urban crises (Ortiz and Millan, 2022; Beveridge & Davidson, 2025; Coelho et al., 2025; Shafique, 2025). While these ongoing interventions offer examples of transformation that respond to polycritical cities and unsettle the conventions of academic expression, they remain largely marginal to mainstream academic production.

The objective of the panel is to build on the works of feminist/and decolonial scholars and to cultivate more public and accessible anthropological engagements with cities through visual methods (Pink, 2025). Responding to Hanson et al.’s (2020) call to “heighten the readers’ audibility” to different possibilities of knowing than “Eurocentric methodologically produced stories”, the session invites contributions that may include, films, graphic narratives, photography, soundscapes, zines, and other participatory methods, that explore, politicise, articulate and tackle facets of urban crises, offering rich, affective, and deeply political accounts of the city that depart from conventional academic formats.

We welcome submissions that respond to one or more of the following questions through empirically grounded research: 

Abstract Submission: If you are interested in joining the in-person ISA session, please submit a (maximum) 300-word abstract by October 14, 2026, through the ISA Congress system: https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2027/cfp.cgi 

For any queries, you can reach out at: nianpaul2012@gmail.com; rainaghosh@hotmail.com.

References

  1. Beveridge, R., & Davidson, M. (2025). Crisis and urban research: Preliminary reflections. Dialogues in Urban Research, 3(3), 265-273. 
  2. Coelho, L. X. P., Melgaço, L., Saharan, T., & Rajendran, L. P. (2025). Decolonising Urban Planning Research in the Global South: A Call for Shifting the Gaze. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 45(4), 802-808.
  3. Hanson, N. D., Hernandez, C., Le Feber, T., & Medina, S. (2020). How to be unfaithful to Eurocentrism: A Spanglish decolonial critique to knowledge gentrification, captivity and storycide in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 25(1), 145-165. 
  4. Madden, D. (2023). Polycritical city?. City, 27(3-4), 271-274. 
  5. Ortiz, C., & Millan, G. (2022). Critical urban pedagogy: Convites as sites of southern urbanism, solidarity construction and urban learning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(5), 822-844. 
  6. Pink, S. (2011). Images, Senses and Applications: Engaging Visual Anthropology. Visual Anthropology, 24(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2011.604611 
  7. Pink, S. (2025). Futures Anthropology for the Polycrisis. Anthropological Forum, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2025.2521750
  8. Shafique, T. (2025). Dirty research: a call towards decolonial urban knowledge production. City, 29(3-4), 502-515.